Built for DevsDeveloper Adoption Score

Arcjet

https://arcjet.com/ ยท 2/11/2026

73/120

Good

-34 from previous

Strong developer-focused security product with excellent code examples and clear value proposition, but critically hampered by completely broken documentation

Score Breakdown

Technical Depth

6/10

Product Cohesion

6/10

Developer Tooling

7/10

Learning Resources

6/10

Trust & Social Proof

8/10

Integration Context

8/10

Trial Accessibility

9/10

Documentation Quality

2/10

Technical Credibility

7/10

Developer Support Quality

4/10

Value Proposition Clarity

8/10

Developer Recognition Signals

9/10

Red Flags

Broken or outdated docs

Multiple documentation URLs return 404 errors, making it impossible to access technical details needed for evaluation and implementation

-5

No community presence

No visible Discord, Slack, forum, or GitHub community links despite mentioning community support

-2

Critical Issues

Documentation completely inaccessible

Impact: Developers cannot access technical details, API reference, or implementation guides

Developer behavior: Will likely abandon evaluation due to inability to understand technical implementation details

No visible community support channels

Impact: Developers have no way to get help or see if the community is active

Developer behavior: May hesitate to adopt due to uncertainty about getting support when stuck

Quick Wins

1

Fix all broken documentation links immediately

Would dramatically improve developer confidence and evaluation ability

medium effort
2

Add visible links to Discord/Slack community or GitHub discussions

Provides developers with support channels and community validation

low effort
3

Add GitHub stars/repository link to homepage for social proof

Increases developer trust through visible community adoption metrics

low effort

Strategic Opportunities

Documentation Infrastructure

Gap: Complete documentation inaccessibility

Impact: Prevents proper technical evaluation and implementation

Rebuild documentation site with proper routing and comprehensive API reference

Developer Community

Gap: No visible community presence despite offering community support

Impact: Reduces confidence in getting help and seeing real usage

Create active Discord/Slack community and showcase GitHub activity

Technical Depth Showcase

Gap: Limited architecture diagrams and performance benchmarks

Impact: Harder to understand system design and performance characteristics

Add architecture diagrams, performance comparisons, and technical deep-dives

What This Score Can't Tell You

This evaluation is based on your public-facing web presence. Only hands-on testing by real developers can reveal:

  • Whether the WASM-based local processing actually delivers the promised performance benefits compared to cloud-based security solutions
  • How well the DRY_RUN mode works in practice for testing security rules without impacting production traffic
  • The actual developer experience of debugging security rule conflicts when multiple Arcjet rules are applied to the same endpoint
  • How the local-first approach handles edge cases like network partitions or when the Arcjet service is temporarily unavailable
  • The real-world accuracy of the bot detection and whether it produces false positives that impact legitimate users

See what real developers think about your product

Built for Devs helps companies building developer products get candid insights from their target developers through recorded product evaluations.

Get Real Developer Feedback